Case index
Case File 006Work · Hyundai AutoeverStatus: Closed2025

In-Memory Concurrency Queue — High-Volume Notification Batching

Thread-safe in-memory Java batch queue (10s interval) reducing database connection pool overloading by 55%.

Connection relief
-55% Strain

Overloading eliminated under notification spikes.

Flush interval
10s Timed Batch

Thread-safe scheduled batch bulk inserts.

Architecture
Zero Infra Overhead

Java in-memory concurrency without Kafka.

Opening brief

High-frequency notification write operations overwhelmed database connection pools; dedicated message brokers like Kafka were unavailable due to infrastructure constraints.

Outcome on record

Engineered a thread-safe, in-memory Java batch queue flushing every 10 seconds, cutting database connection pool strain by 55% without external infrastructure dependencies.

Exhibit A

Project description

Filed statement

Identified database connection pool exhaustion caused by high-frequency individual notification insert operations.

Engineered a thread-safe, in-memory Java queue using concurrent data structures to buffer notification requests without external message broker infrastructure.

Configured a scheduled batch worker that flushes and bulk-inserts queued notifications every 10 seconds.

Achieved a 55% reduction in database connection pool strain, preventing connection timeouts during peak traffic bursts.

Exhibit B

Why I built this

Filed statement

High notification insert volume was overwhelming available database connection pool limits.

External message brokers like Kafka were unavailable due to infrastructure and resource constraints.

Exhibit C

Process and execution

Approach

How the work moved

  • Diagnosed database connection pool exhaustion caused by high-volume individual notification insert transactions.
  • Architected a thread-safe in-memory buffer using concurrent Java data structures to decouple notification generation from database writes.
  • Implemented a scheduled batch worker that flushes queued notifications via batch SQL inserts at fixed 10-second intervals.
  • Monitored connection pool metrics, confirming a 55% reduction in pool strain under peak notification bursts.
Responsibilities

What I owned

  • Led the work as Associate Consultant - Java Backend Developer.
  • Turned messy context into a clearer operating model, interaction direction, and rollout shape.
  • Worked across stakeholders to move the project from framing into execution.
Exhibit D

Notable decisions

Decision

In-memory concurrent batch queue

Avoided heavy external broker dependencies (like Kafka) by implementing a lightweight, thread-safe in-memory buffer in Java.

Decision

10-second timed batch flushing

Aggregated single inserts into bulk SQL statements every 10 seconds, minimizing connection pool acquisition overhead.

Exhibit E

What I learned from this

Filed statement

Thread-safe concurrent in-memory queues in Java can solve high write bottlenecks when external message broker infrastructure is not an option.

Batch SQL writes on a 10s interval drastically reduce connection pool acquisition contention.

Back to case index
JavaConcurrencyIn-Memory QueueBatch ProcessingSQL OptimizationHyundai Autoever